Nevada voted to enshrine abortion rights in its constitution. What to know about key ballot measures

Associated Press

LAS VEGAS (AP) — A ballot question to enshrine Nevada’s abortion rights in the state constitution has received its first nod of approval from voters, who must also approve the measure in 2026 in order to amend the constitution.

The measure passed early Wednesday morning.

It’s a win for supporters in the state and elsewhere who are fighting to strengthen abortion access after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision that made abortion legal nationwide for 50 years. It also comes more than 30 years after Nevada residents overwhelmingly voted to legalize abortions until 24 weeks, with exceptions to save a mother’s life or to protect her health.

Here’s a closer look at the key ballot measures in Nevada, including abortion access:

Abortion rights

If the abortion ballot measure again passes in 2026, it wouldn’t expand current access in the state, but supporters and organizers of the initiative say it will add an extra layer of protection.

State laws in Nevada are more vulnerable to change — the current 1990 law could be reversed by another voter referendum — but proposed amendments to the state constitution have to pass in two consecutive elections.

Las Vegas resident Laura Campbell, 36, said she supports the initiative to strengthen Nevada’s current abortion protections. Without it, Campbell said she isn’t sure she would be alive today.

At 27 weeks, she said she learned that her pregnancy was nonviable, meaning the fetus couldn’t survive outside her womb. Her doctor took her hand and promised to take care of her.

“I was able to come out of that healthy and able to get pregnant again,” Campbell said. A year later, she gave birth to her daughter, now 3. “I could have been a tragic story.”

Opponents say the ballot measure goes too far because it wouldn’t outright define “fetal viability” in the constitution. Anti-abortion group Nevada Right to Life also said in a recent ad that the initiative was “deceptively worded” because it doesn’t make clear that abortion is already legal in the state.

Voting process

Nevada voters rejected a measure to open up primary elections and implement ranked choice voting in general elections, fundamentally changing elections in a key swing state.

The measure failed Tuesday.

Nonpartisan voters outnumber registered Democrats and Republicans in Nevada, while 42% of voters do not belong to one of the major parties. Supporters of the measure said opening up primaries would give a voice to more than 1 million registered voters in the state who don’t have a say in the nomination of major-party candidates for Congressional races and statewide office.

Starting in 2026, Nevada will hold open primary races for Congress, statewide office and the state legislature. The changes won’t affect presidential primaries and races for elected office at the local level.

Under the new system, the top five primary candidates, regardless of their political affiliation, will advance to the general election, in which voters rank by preference up to five candidates. The first candidate to receive more than 50% of the vote would be declared the winner.

If none of the candidates immediately win the majority, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes would then be redistributed to the voter’s next highest ranked candidate. The process would repeat until a winner is declared.

The citizen-led initiative faced opposition from both Republican and Democratic party leaders who said the measure was too broad and that ranked choice voting was too confusing.

Voters also gave a nod of approval to a Republican-led initiative that would require voters to show photo identification at the polls. Voters must again pass the measure in 2026 before the requirement can be added to the state constitution.

Forced labor removed from law

Nevada voters rejected slavery or indentured servitude as a criminal punishment, which was still on the books in the state constitution.

The measure passed Tuesday.

Supporters of the initiative said it was a step in the right direction for civil rights. The measure aims to protect incarcerated people from being forced to work under the threat of punishment.

Nevada incarcerates about 10,000 people. All prisoners in the state are required to work or be in vocational training for 40 hours each week, unless they have a medical exemption. Some of them make as little as 35 cents hourly.

Nevada joins several other states — Colorado, Alabama and Tennessee — that have in recent years done away with exceptions for slavery and involuntary servitude, though the changes were not immediate.

In Colorado — the first state to get rid of an exception for slavery from its constitution in 2018 — incarcerated people alleged in a 2022 lawsuit against the corrections department that they were still forced to work.

“The momentum we’ve built in Nevada, coupled with our achievements in seven other states, strengthens our resolve to continue this work nationwide,” Jamilia Land, co-founder of the Abolish Slavery National Network, which advocated for the Colorado measure, said in a statement. “We are unwavering in our commitment to remove involuntary servitude from every state constitution.”

—

Associated Press reporter Sophie Austin contributed to this report.